David Bohm fue un ser humano brillante.
Como persona, eligió no ceder a la presión durante la caza de brujas del senador Mc Carthy y acabó perdiendo su cátedra y abandonó Estados Unidos para irse a Brasil primero, Israel después y Reino Unido finalmente.
Como pensador, fue uno de los más brillantes físicos cuánticos y filósofos; y estuvo profundamente influenciado tanto por Jiddu Krishnamurti como por Albert Einstein, quien dijo de él que debía ser considerado como su sucesor intelectual.
Dio un paso más que sus colegas y trasladó a la propia estructura del espacio-tiempo, la propiedad lógica emergida en todos los fenómenos producidos en el dominio cuántico del espacio-tiempo, es decir que lo que aquí es UNO, en el interior invisible del dominio cuántico es TODO, proponiendo que a esta realidad de totalidades diferenciadas (partículas) u Orden Explicado, le correspondía otra realidad de totalidades interconectadas (holograma) u Orden Implicado.
Su teoría ha sido descartada sin prueba alguna a pesar de que la teoría actual que sitúa a la física de partículas como EJE CENTRAL DEL ESPACIO-TIEMPO es incompatible con algunos fenómenos reproducibles en laboratorio.
Fenómenos como la Homeopatía, reproducibles "en ausencia del doble ciego", confirman la existencia del Holograma y por tanto ponen en entredicho las conclusiones de los expertos sobre la mínima posibilidad de amenaza que supone la ruptura espacio-temporal (generación de microagujeros negros) que probablemente se producirá en el LHC.
Los expertos no han tenido en cuenta las consecuencias que tal ruptura espacio-temporal tendrá sobre "el holograma", según la estructura espacio-temporal propuesta por David Bohm
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
"Me gustaría decir que en mi trabajo científico y filosófico, mi principal preocupación ha sido la comprensión de la naturaleza de la realidad en general y de la conciencia en particular, como una totalidad coherente, que nunca es estática o completa, sino un proceso sin fin de movimiento y desdoblamiento"
David Bohm: Totalidad y el Orden Implicado
"Me gustaría decir que en mi trabajo científico y filosófico, mi principal preocupación ha sido la comprensión de la naturaleza de la realidad en general y de la conciencia en particular, como una totalidad coherente, que nunca es estática o completa, sino un proceso sin fin de movimiento y desdoblamiento"
David Bohm: Totalidad y el Orden Implicado
Orden Explicado-Implicado en el Momento YinYang
Bohm sent copies of his textbook to Bohr and Einstein. Bohr did not respond, but Einstein phoned him to say that he wanted to discuss it with him. In the first of what was to turn into a six-month series of spirited conversations, Einstein enthusiastically told Bohm that he had never seen quantum theory presented so clearly, and admitted that he was just as dissatisfied with the orthodox approach as Bohm was. They both admired quantum theory's ability to predict phenomena, but could not accept that it was complete and that it was impossible to arrive at any clearer understanding of what was going on in the quantum realm.
en la dimensión cuántica
Universo Fractal y Holográfico
Interview with Physicist David Bohm, at Niels Bohr Institute - 1989
-
Fritjof Capra - *Fritjof Capra* (nacido el 1 de Febrero de 1939) es un reconocido Físico Austriaco nacido en Viena. Doctor en física teórica por la Universidad de Viena (...
Hace 15 años
El mensaje de la obra de Bohm está en su sugerencia de que para comprender a fondo los fenómenos del mundo subatómico debemos empezar por adoptar una concepción totalmente nueva de lo que es el "orden". Esa comprensión supone pasar de lo mecánico a lo holográfico, es decir, al punto de vista de que un fenómeno puede ser entendido no tanto si se examina por sus partes, sino cuando se estudia desde su totalidad, que es más que la suma de aquéllas. Según vemos, también en otras ramas de la ciencia están apareciendo sugerencias acerca de esta nueva forma de concebir el orden.
http://www.utm.mx/~temas/temas-docs/e0317.pdf
Bohm: Well, they say three persons, the Trinity, which are one. Anyway, it is something like a human being, or rather the other way around; that man is the image of God. That implies that there is a total significance. If you say Atman, in Hinduism, something similar is implied.
Weber: Atman and Brahman, seen as identical; the micro- and the macrocosm.
Bohm: Yes, and Atman is from the side of meaning. You would say Atman is more like the meaning. But then what is meant would be Brahman, I suppose; the identity of consciousness and cosmos.
By Jonathan Burch
http://ourworldharmony.com/kDavidBo.htm
"What Bohm calls the totality appears to be the same no-thing called Purusa in Sânkhya and Brahman in Vedânta" A PhD level Academic & Philosophical discourse on ID By Dara Tatray
http://www.intelligentdesign.org.au/invitedexpert/daratatray.html
http://www.utm.mx/~temas/temas-docs/e0317.pdf
Bohm: Well, they say three persons, the Trinity, which are one. Anyway, it is something like a human being, or rather the other way around; that man is the image of God. That implies that there is a total significance. If you say Atman, in Hinduism, something similar is implied.
Weber: Atman and Brahman, seen as identical; the micro- and the macrocosm.
Bohm: Yes, and Atman is from the side of meaning. You would say Atman is more like the meaning. But then what is meant would be Brahman, I suppose; the identity of consciousness and cosmos.
By Jonathan Burch
http://ourworldharmony.com/kDavidBo.htm
"What Bohm calls the totality appears to be the same no-thing called Purusa in Sânkhya and Brahman in Vedânta" A PhD level Academic & Philosophical discourse on ID By Dara Tatray
http://www.intelligentdesign.org.au/invitedexpert/daratatray.html
In 1951 Bohm wrote a classic textbook entitled Quantum Theory, in which he presented a clear account of the orthodox, Copenhagen interpretation of quantum physics. The Copenhagen interpretation was formulated mainly by Niels Bohr and Werner Heisenberg in the 1920s and is still highly influential today. But even before the book was published, Bohm began to have doubts about the assumptions underlying the conventional approach. He had difficulty accepting that subatomic particles had no objective existence and took on definite properties only when physicists tried to observe and measure them. He also had difficulty believing that the quantum world was characterized by absolute indeterminism and chance, and that things just happened for no reason whatsoever. He began to suspect that there might be deeper causes behind the apparently random and crazy nature of the subatomic world.
Bohm sent copies of his textbook to Bohr and Einstein. Bohr did not respond, but Einstein phoned him to say that he wanted to discuss it with him. In the first of what was to turn into a six-month series of spirited conversations, Einstein enthusiastically told Bohm that he had never seen quantum theory presented so clearly, and admitted that he was just as dissatisfied with the orthodox approach as Bohm was. They both admired quantum theory's ability to predict phenomena, but could not accept that it was complete and that it was impossible to arrive at any clearer understanding of what was going on in the quantum realm.
"David Bohm and the Implicate Order", by David Pratt
Bohm sent copies of his textbook to Bohr and Einstein. Bohr did not respond, but Einstein phoned him to say that he wanted to discuss it with him. In the first of what was to turn into a six-month series of spirited conversations, Einstein enthusiastically told Bohm that he had never seen quantum theory presented so clearly, and admitted that he was just as dissatisfied with the orthodox approach as Bohm was. They both admired quantum theory's ability to predict phenomena, but could not accept that it was complete and that it was impossible to arrive at any clearer understanding of what was going on in the quantum realm.
"David Bohm and the Implicate Order", by David Pratt